(PCC) The school has a nice campuse and facilities (not

Educational Quality	D-	Faculty Accessibility	F
Useful Schoolwork	F	Excess Competition	D
Academic Success	C-	Creativity/ Innovation	D-
Individual Value	F	University Resource Use	D+
Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty	B	Friendliness	D
Campus Maintenance	B-	Social Life	D-
Surrounding City	C-	Extra Curriculars	D-
Safety	B

Describes the student body as: , , , ' color='class=grade' > Describes the faculty as: , , , ' color='class=grade' >

Male

1450

Not so bright

Faculty Accessibility	F

Campus Aesthetics/ Beauty	B

He cares more about Faculty Accessibility than the average student.

Date: May 26 2010
Major: (This Major's Salary over time)
The school has a nice campuse and facilities (not faculty just facilities.)but thats about thier only selling point. I do not reccomend this school to anyone. I'm not just saying the typical "wow these rules are gay!" comment but I'm actually trying to tell you the truth! Which is that about 95% of the faculty thier are self absorbed, vain, arrogant, just-for-show, carnal christians. And its really sad because thier whole advertising scheme is the opposite. They portray themselves as the "perfect christians" trying to help other christians with "the most perfect school of christ on earth!" (sorry to steal that from the late MR. Knox)But honestly this school could be a good place to study if it did not have the o so typical unhumble just for show christian leadership that so many religious places have struggled with since the beggining of time. So over all I rate this high for campus and facilities and extremely low for faculty and leadership. I wont get into the student body because that would just be way to long to explain.

Responses